You are viewing content from a past/completed QCon

Presentation: Serverless Patterns and Anti-Patterns

Track: Finding the Serverless Sweetspot

Location: Broadway Ballroom South, 6th fl.

Duration: 1:40pm - 2:30pm

Day of week: Friday

Level: Intermediate - Advanced

Persona: Architect, Developer

Share this on:

This presentation is now available to view on InfoQ.com

Watch video

What You’ll Learn

  • Learn pragmatic approaches to architecture that allows developers to focus on business logic and not infrastructure.

  • Hear stories of achieving high reliability and scale without a lot of undifferentiated heavy lifting.

  • Understand approaches you can take today to improve development velocity.

Abstract

Serverless has amazing potential to increase organizational agility and decrease operational costs, but realizing those benefits requires proper implementation. In this talk, we will cover the ideal patterns for serverless applications, anti-patterns for both greenfield applications and migrations, and real-world unexpected consequences of running serverless applications in production. Presented by Joe Emison, who has architected and deployed multiple serverless applications serving millions of users on both the Google and AWS clouds.

Question: 

What’s the structure of this talk?

Answer: 

I strongly believe in getting the definition right and also talking about what I’m optimizing for. I will start with when I say serverless what do I mean. It’s about achieving business goals. It’s about not doing the undifferentiated heavy lifting. It’s about spending 95% (or more_ of your in-house developers time on customer-facing interactions.

I love this quote by Warren Buffet that says “I only invest in companies that can be run by idiots because eventually, they will.” To me, there’s a software developer version of this that says you should develop your code so that it can be maintained by let’s say average developers because it will be. So we need to be cognizant of making maintainable code. To me, there is a strong corollary to that which is ‘less code is more maintainable always’.

With that framing in mind, I talk about the patterns and the anti-patterns. So, for example, one anti-pattern I’ll talk about is around developers who are used to taking frameworks/languages like Ruby on Rails, Django, or .NET (or something that has these thick middle tiers) and just moving them over. That’s an antipattern. As is functions calling functions. Functions are glue. Functions as a service are great, but to view serverless as a series of connected functions that exist in a backend is to miss the massive business and organizational gains you can get back by thinking about this pattern where functions exist to glue things together from largely leveraging services that already exist.

Question: 

This sounds like you’re talking to leadership. QCon is a very technical audience. What do you feel the audience will glean from the talk?

Answer: 

This is all incredibly practical for a technical audience.

If you're an architect, I'm laying out for you that when you're architecting your application, you should leverage services. Services are a key part of your architecture. Instead of saying here’s all the code we’re going to write, how can you design the architecture so that we can take our developers time and put it towards developing features. From an architecture standpoint, this is largely a talk about (if you design applications) you should take an approach to your applications that is service-centric and that builds on these backend middle tier services as opposed to writing and running them yourself.

From a developer standpoint, I mean if you’re a line developer who is being assigned stories and you have to implement those stories in a certain way, this talk may not be for you. I’m talking to people who have a choice in how they can implement things.

Question: 

Can you elaborate a bit more?

Answer: 

Let’s say you’re a developer who’s being asked to implement something and you’re in the planning meetings. You have the ability to suggest why don’t we use this technology. Being able to guide a team towards something like Firebase or an AppSync or one of the Parse replacement services (especially, as you startup new greenfield projects or prototypes) is hugely beneficial for a technical audience.

One of the examples that I’ll share is we launched a Zillow for a commercial real estate that got to about half a million monthly uniques that we ran on Firebase and Algolia with no uptime or scaling problems and with very low cost. With that example, I’ll discuss some specific metrics on how long certain things took and problems we did run into that we just didn’t expect.

Speaker: Joe Emison

CTO @Branch

Joe is a serial technical co-founder, recently launching his fifth company, Branch, in March. His previous ventures have been BuildFax (acquired by DMGT), Spaceful (acquired by Xceligent), BluePrince (acquired by Harris Computer), and EphPod (acquired by Wind Solutions). Additionally, he has consulted with many other companies on software development and cloud migrations, including many in the DMGT portfolio. Joe graduated with degrees in English and Mathematics from Williams College and has a law degree from Yale Law School.

Find Joe Emison at

2019 Tracks

Monday, 24 June

Tuesday, 25 June

Wednesday, 26 June